“When to
Hold’em and When to Fold’em”
Life
is not perfect. I know it’s disappointing to hear but it’s true. Life is not
perfected. In fact we are forced to make one compromise after another. Faced
with limited time and limited resources, we have to choose what we will set as
a priorities and what we will let go of. We have to choose, “When to hold’em
and when to fold’em.”
All this month we are focusing on the
theme of letting go, which is a huge spiritual endeavor. So to start out that
conversation I thought we should spend some time talking about how to decide
what to let go of, and what to hold on to. It seems that in our lives there are
a good many things that call us into being our best selves. They give us a
foundation for deeper and wider exploration, they resonate with our truest
sense of self. Then there are a good many other things in our life that limit
us, that distract us, that prevent our truest self from being expressed and
fully living.
In a way this is what we talk about
every Sunday in our worship services. We come together here and remind each
other of our priorities in worship. That is what the word worship means after
all. We don’t come here to may homage to some divine being. Our worship is much
more nuanced than that. What we do for worship can be seen from the word
itself. The word “worship” comes from the Old English worthscipe, meaning
worthiness or worth-ship — at its simplest, to give worth to something. The
historical details are not all that important, but I bring up the concept of
worthship because it describes what worship means to us as Unitarian
Universalists. In worship, we celebrate and name those things that are most
important to us. For some of us that means worshiping God; for others that
means celebrating our highest ideals and ethical principles.
Sometimes the reminder is more
grounded, it is about personal relationships. Sometimes it is about justice,
sometimes it is about more abstract ideals or spiritual matters. But at the end
of it all, we come here to name and remind each other what our priorities in
life are, what we want to hold on to. And hopefully in doing so, we offer a
foundation to build on.
One of the ways of discerning when to
hold’em and when to fold’em, or what our priorities are, is the way they ground
our life. I’m talking about religious belief now, but the same is true for any other
belief or relationship. Some serve as a foundation that we can grow and expand
from, and others are an anchor that only weigh us down. In terms of religion,
this looks like offering a living tradition. That’s the title of our hymnals,
and it is woven through a good portion of writing about Unitarian Universalism.
We aim to be a living tradition, a faith that is both grounded in the past, but
also growing and living into a dynamic future.
As progressive religious folks, we are
able to pretty clearly point to that difference. We know that some religious
beliefs are limiting while other beliefs are expansive. But the same is true
for other beliefs and priorities. Some of the things that we hold dear serve us
well as an foundation for growth, and others really limit our potential. But it
isn’t always easy to tell the difference.
Perhaps
the biggest challenge in this decision of when to hold’em and when to fold’em
is that no one else can tell you the answer.
Deciding what to hold tight to depends most of all on what is in your
own heart and who you are as a person. Even if your commitments don’t line up
with what the rest of the world might think is best, it’s up to you to listen
to your heart and to figure out how are should play the game. Sometimes doing
your best and being true to yourself doesn’t bring the most obvious success.
But in the end, I promise you, it’s the only way to win.
The writer John Fulghum has an
interesting story about just this phenomenon. Well it’s not so much a story as
a version of someone else’s biography. It’s the story of the 19th
century Unitarian, John Pierpont.
John
Pierpont died a failure in 1866, at age eighty-one, he came to the end of his
days a government clerk in Washington D.C., with a long string of personal
defeats abrading his spirit.
Things
began well enough. He graduated from Yale, and chose education as his
profession. He was a failure at school teaching. He was too easy on his
students. So he turned to the legal world for training.
But,
he was a failure as a lawyer. He was too generous with his clients and too
concerned about justice to take the cases that brought good fees. The next
career he took up was dry-goods sales.
He
was a failure as a businessman. He could not charge enough for his goods to
make a profit, and was too liberal with credit.
He wrote poetry and though it was published, he
didn’t collect enough royalties to make a living.
He
was a failure as a poet. And so he decided to become a minister, went off to
Harvard Divinity School, was ordained as a minister of the Hollis Street Church
in Boston. But his position for prohibition against slavery got him in trouble
with the influential members of his congregation and he was forced to resign.
He
was a failure as a minister, then also a failure at politics for his stance on slavery.
The civil war came along, and he volunteered as a chaplain of the 22nd
Regiment of Massachusetts Volunteers. Two weeks later he quit, having found the
task too much strain on his health. He was seventy-six years old. He couldn’t
even make it as a chaplain.
Finally
someone found him an obscure job in the back offices of the Treasury Department
in Washington D.C. where he finished out
the last five years of his life. He actually wasn’t too good at that either.
His heart wasn’t in it.
John
Pierpont died a failure, having accomplished nothing that he set out to be.
Today there is a small memorial stone marking his grave. The words read: POET,
PREACHER, PHILOSOPHER, PHILANTRHOPIST.
John Pierpont knew what to hold onto in
his life. Even when his commitments appeared as failure to some, he continued
to pursue the life he knew was in his heart. It took a while for the rest of
the world to catch up with him, but in the end, it was his commitment to his
true self that made him a really remarkable human being. Not titles or
trophies, but personal commitment and fortitude marked his life. He knew well,
what to hold on to, and what to let go of.
If
knowing what to hold onto and what to let go of is about tuning into your
heart, and your true self, I guess we should talk a little bit about the
differences between our true self and the things that distract us. We all have
distractions, different coping mechanisms that make life a little more
comfortable. Some of them are big, some small, some are momentary and others
can last a whole lifetime.
I remember a very jaded moment several years
ago, a friend thought he was being wise and real, when he said “Isn’t that all
life is anyway, a long series of coping mechanisms?” I look back and remember
the conversation and part of me thinks, wow, what a terribly sad and bitter
thing to say. “Isn’t that all life is anyway, a long series of coping
mechanisms?”
Each one of us uses some coping
mechanisms. They are ways that we act, masks that we wear to make the world a
little more comfortable. We learn to start wearing them from a very early age,
as soon as we learn that some piece of us isn’t that pleasant, or we find that
our feelings can get hurt. So we hide a little bit, or take on some persona to
cover up something.
This is especially true for survivors
of trauma. Whatever the trauma is that occurs in our life, it changes the way
we act in the world for a while. Our sense that the world is safe is
challenged, so we add a layer of protection, a mask, a shield. We create a
slightly different persona to hide behind. Of course if we are fortunate to
have the opportunity to learn again that the world is safe, through friends and
family and loving community, then we can put down some of that shield. We can
let it go. But the truth is many of us, I might even say most of us, carry with
us throughout our lives a bit of a mask, a coping mechanism, a way of being
that is not in complete harmony with our real self, because it is not our real
self.
There are a couple of unfortunate
things about these masks, or coping mechanism. Probably the most important is
that they get in the way of us being our full and complete self. But they also
stand between us and the people that we care about. Rather than two people
sharing their sincere hopes and dreams, we find a couple of coping mechanism
coming up against each other. Don’t get me wrong, coping mechanisms and masks
can fit very, very well together. They can lock two people together like glue.
But is that the best that life has to offer? Two false versions locked together
forever? I’m fully convinced that life
and love has more to offer us than that. But for real relationship to develop,
romantic or otherwise, we have to set down some of the disguises and put our
real amazing self out there.
The
other really unfortunate thing about masks is that they take a tremendous
amount of energy to maintain. Acting is very hard work. Being someone other
than your true self is exhausting stuff. And it is taking evergy that could be
spent doing things that you really care about. As I told my friend, no, life is not just one
long series of coping mechanisms. Though we do all from time to time grab a
hold of an idea or a way of being that isn’t really true to our self. We’ve all
been there, we all have a few things in our life that we would be better off
without.
We have been talking about letting go
for a while now. By now you have probably begun taking stock of your own life.
You have probably started to name some of the things that you do that mask the
real you, or some of the things that tie you down rather than give you a foundation.
If you haven’t, well then I want you to think about it right now. What two
things do you want to let go of, two things that prevent you from being your
true self? These are things that take up your energy that could be spent on
something you really care about. They are things that build a barrier between
you and the people you love. What two things do you want to let go of?
I want you to hold them in your two
hands. Make a fist and hold on to them tightly, as tight as you can. You’ve
probably been holding onto these masks and coping mechanisms for years and they
probably make you feel much safer. In just a minute, we are going to let them
go, but for now, take this time to say goodbye to them.
On
the count of three, I want you to open your hands, and just let go.
1-2-3
I felt challenged by this sermon as it was presented last Sunday. Two distinct areas claimed my attention. The first was the distinction between friendship and relationship. Are all friendships relationships? Is there a distinction between friendship and relationship? Is this distinction significant?
ReplyDeleteThe second area that claimed my attention was the notion of "Masks." In this sermon, it seems reducing the mask is called for. I attended a seminar just a few months with a psychologist who claimed to be the therapist to the stars. This psychologist said you should pay attention to your mask and deliberately cultivate it because this is what you present to society. I'm of two minds, (two masks?). If one thinks of the Venn diagram, it would be best if the mask and the genuine self overlapped as much as possible. I came across an interesting statement: "Fences make good neighbors." Are masks not a form of a fence or boundary?
At any rate, this sermon challenged me and made me think. Thanks for that!!!!